Showing posts with label Dracula. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Dracula. Show all posts

Sunday, 7 October 2012

Karl Marx: Vampire Hunter?


Karl Marx: Vampire Hunter?

Did you know that the works of Karl Marx and his followers are full of mentioning of vampires? It has been calculated that Marx used the vampire metaphor at least three times in Capital. For example, in one of the cases Marx describes British industry as “vampire-like” which “could but live by sucking blood, and children’s blood too”. Here is another quote: "“Capital is dead labour which, vampire-like, lives only by sucking living labour, and lives the more, the more labour it sucks".

Marx’s colleague and long-time sponsor Frederick Engels also used the vampire metaphor in his works and public addresses. In one of his works entitled The Condition of the Working Class in England, Engels identifies and blames the “vampire property-holding class” as the source of "all the social troubles".

Marx’s and Engel’s perception of vampires corresponds very much to the recent Hollywood film Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter directed by Timur Bekmambetov. In the film, based on the eponymous book by Seth Grahame-Smith, the 16th president of the United States leads a secret life of a vampire hunter searching and destroying vampires. Vampires in the film supported slave trade and intended to start the Civil War to conquer the North and enslave all American population. In his secret diary, Abraham Lincoln writes that those vampires are “virtually everywhere” - layers, bankers, shop owners, in short the bourgeoisie accused by Marx and Engels of blood thirst.

Marx described vampires’ habits, their greediness and their lounging for blood in such a detail that in many cases it crossed the boundaries of the mere metaphor. Although many researchers perceive Marx’s vampires as metaphoric abstract bourgeois bloodsuckers feeding on working people, his knowledge of vampires is very peculiar. In one particular case, when describing Wallachian peasants performing forced labour for their boyars, Marx refers to one specific “boyar” who was “drunk with victory” and who might have been no one but Wallachian prince Vlad (called “The Impaler”) – or Count Dracula himself!

All this is very interesting because the best-known novel of vampiric genre, Bram Stoker’s Dracula, did not see the daylight until 1897, the whole 14 years after Marx’s death. Surely, one can place the Marx’s metaphor in the wider context of nineteenth-century gothic and horror stories which were abundant these days, and of which Marx was a huge fan. On the other hand, one might assume that some of the vampire legends were true and Marx and his contemporaries were aware of that.


Thursday, 3 November 2011

Dracula in Romania (and beyond)


Greetings from a conference in Romania! Unfortunately, the conference was not on vampires this time. We, scientists, have to meet and talk about mundane problems from time to time. Besides, Romania can be a normal country too!

What we would like to tell you today is the story of Dracula. Dracula, as we know him, was the center figure of Bram Stoker’s 1897 eponymous novel. According to the book, he lived in a castle in Borgo pass, so today thousands of tourists go to castle Bran near Brasov, Romania to breathe in the terrifying atmosphere and (perhaps) to see the Count with their own eyes. In fact, the castle has nothing to do with the novel (or with Count Dracula) and is only being marketed by Romanian tourist agencies to gullible tourists. You can read an interesting and funny encounter of a search for Dracula described by Tanya Gold from The Guardian here.

However, do not try to ask your Romanian friends about “Dracula”! Dracula is a fictional figure and after several minutes of discussions you will settle the dispute in by talking about Vlad III, Prince of Wallachia (1431-1476) who was known as “Dracula” (meaning “son of the Dragon”). Vlad’s father was a member of the Order of the Dragon (Dracul) which gave him this nickname. Vlad was a cruel and gruesome ruler but he managed to fight the Ottoman Turks well and was praised by both his people and by his allies. He became known for impaling his enemies, a habit that also earned him the nickname “Vlad the Impaler” (“Vlad Ţepeş” in Romanian).

Allegedly, Bram Stoker stumbled upon Vlad while studying Romanian and Hungarian history and used the name for his main character (the initial idea was “Count Wampyr”). In reality, however, Vlad III does not have anything to do with vampires. On the contrary, he is a respected historical figure and a national hero. In 1997 Romania printed stamps with his portrait and in 2010 National Bank of Romania minted commemorative coins dedicated to Vlad on the occasion of celebrating 550 years since the first mention in writing of Bucharest, under his rule, on 20 September 1459.

Bram Stoker was rather basing his plot on so-called “vampire craze’' that took place in the 1720s and 1730s in a part of Serbia that was temporarily attached to the Habsburg monarchy after the Treaty of Passarowitz (1718). Two peasants, Petar Blagojevic and Arnaut Pavle, who died suddenly and without any obvious reason and were reported being seen after their deaths, allegedly caused several other mysterious deaths of their fellow villagers in the settlements of Kisiljevo and Medveda. The Austrian authorities were called in and the whole affair culminated in an exhumation of suspected vampires, cutting off and burning of their heads and bodies. The whole story which was most likely caused by the poor understanding of infectious diseases and knowledge of the decomposition of human body, was vividly described in official reports of that time and attracted Stoker’s attention while his research in the British Library.

Let us analyze the events described in “Dracula” (and Stephen King’s “’Salem’s Lot”, which provides a very similar scenario but is set in New England). The interactions between vampires and humans are portrayed in the following way: a vampire selects a human victim and gets into its proximity (it typically happens after dark and the vampire needs the victim to invite her/him in). Often the vampire does not require permission to enter the victim’s premises and attacks the sleeping victim. The vampire bites the victim and drinks the victim’s blood, then returns to feed for 4-5 consecutive days, whereupon the victim dies, is buried and rises to become another vampire (unless a wooden stake is put through its heart). Vampires usually need to feed every day, so more and more human beings are constantly turned into vampires.

Assume the events described in “Dracula” (or in “’Salem’s Lot”) were real. How would things evolve given the Stoker-King model dynamics described in both sources? Let us take 1897 as the starting point (i.e. the year Stoker’s novel was first published). In 1897, the world population was about 1 650 million people.

The initial conditions of the Stoker-King model are the following: 1 vampire, 1 650 million people, there are no organized groups of vampire slayers (Jonathan Harker and Abraham van Helsing could not be, by all means, considered very efficient vampire slayers). In order to solve this, the Cauchy problem is applied. Due to the fact that the total sum of humans and vampires does not change in time (human population does not grow and humans gradually become vampires), we get to the predator-prey model which is diminished to a simple problem of an epidemic outbreak

The solution to this problem is the following: the human population is drastically reduced by 80% by the 165th day from the moment when the first vampire arrives. This actually means on the 165th day of Count Dracula’s arrival to England the human population reached its critical value and practically became extinct (following the definitions of “Critically Endangered species” by the International Union for Conservation of Nature). At that precise moment, the world would have been inhabited by 1 384 million vampires and 266 million people.

Let us observe the speed with which vampire population grows. The growth of vampire population is extreme: at first, the number of vampires jumps up abruptly, but then slows down and declines. We can determine the moment of time when the speed of vampire population’s growth reaches its maximal values. It is the 153rd day and the number of vampires is the highest (825 million vampires and 286 million of newly turned vampires).

The increase in one population (vampires) inevitably leads to the decrease in another (humans). When the number of vampires reaches the number of human population, the humans disappear altogether. The presence of vampires in the Stoker–King model brings the mankind to the brink of extinction. Therefore, we have to conclude that the Stoker-King model describes the “explosive” growth of vampire population. Within the two months of Dracula’s arrival to England (or Kurt Barlow’s arrival to New England), there would have been 4 thousand vampires in operation. The model analyzed in this scenario is very similar to an epidemic outbreak caused by a deadly virus (e.g. Ebola or SARS). According to the Stoker-King model, vampires need just half a year to take up man’s place in nature. Therefore, the co-existence of humans and vampires described by Bram Stoker seems highly unrealistic.

Sorry everyone! Dracula just does not work! Fortunately, there are other interesting things that do work. Follow our blog and learn more about supernatural economics!

Thursday, 27 October 2011

Vampires do exist!

Halloween is alsmost there and people involuntarily start to think about all these strange and spooky things media and popular culture taught us to belive it. And not just to believe but to think they are associated with Halloween (forget trick-or-treating, you will be watching horror movies again or will go to a costume party).

We, economists, are also subjected to the influce of popular culture. Ghosts, zombies, vampires - sometimes we try to use our creative minds to explore these things too. So, it might not be a big surprise for all of you that we discovered that (under some assumptions) vampires might exists (yes, they are here - maybe it is your strange neighbor or this shop attendant at the local gas station you have never seen at sunlight).

Well, if you are interested in our findings (and want to have a solid proof that vampires DO REALLY EXIST) follow the findings we will present in our blog.

We are going to present a new approach to modeling intertemporal interactions between vampires and humans based on several types of vampire behavior described in popular fiction literature, comic books, films and TV series. The main question we will try to answer would be: If vampires were real and lived amongst us, would their existence be possible? We will draw several scenarios of vampire-human co-existence and use models with differential equations to test whether vampires could have existed amongst us today and under what provisions. Although mathematical modeling usually enables researchers to reject most of the popular scenarios embedded in popular literature and films, you will be surprised to find out that it appears that several popular culture sources outline the models describing plausible and peaceful vampire and human co-existence.

So, who are the winners? Who described the co-existence of humans and vampires in the most accurate way (at least according to science)? What is your guess? The options are listed here:

a) Bram Stoker
b) Stephen King
c) Stephanie Meyer
d) Charlaine Harris

Do you want to know the right answer? Follow our blog and you will learn this (and more) and become a true expert on vampires!

Yours,

Wadim Strielkowski and Evgeny Lisin